Summer Grand Prix Proxy - Printable Version

+- SlotRacer Forum (https://slotracer.online/community)
+-- Forum: Racing (https://slotracer.online/community/forumdisplay.php?fid=27)
+--- Forum: Proxy Racing (https://slotracer.online/community/forumdisplay.php?fid=42)
+--- Thread: Summer Grand Prix Proxy (/showthread.php?tid=2862)

---

RE: Summer Grand Prix Proxy - Graham - 7th-Jun-22

 Good Morning

Had some very good cars from our entrants, and some interesting results.

But first the scrutineers report

[attachment=24015]

[attachment=24016]

[attachment=24017]

[attachment=24018]

All cars were fully compliant in the classes A.B.C. There is an issue in regards to the overall width of 3 of the cars in class D but having seen and measured  them there is absolutely no chance that you could have made them meet the 62mm width for the early modern cars. So I accept that this maximum track width was rather naive for this class and accept the specification was too narrow. So I will declare that all the cars are compliant.

So Next is the photo section

---

RE: Summer Grand Prix Proxy - Graham - 7th-Jun-22

Early Flyers (pre 1961 Front engine cars)

1930 Bugatti T50 #1 (Rokers Roar)
[attachment=24019]

1954 Mercedes W196 #14 ( Mountain View)
[attachment=24020]

1956 Ferrari Super Squalo #2 ( Team RNLI)
[attachment=24021]

1960 Scarab #28 (Team Cube)
[attachment=24023]

1954 Mercedes W196 #50 (RoadRunners)
[attachment=24022]

---

RE: Summer Grand Prix Proxy - Kevan - 7th-Jun-22

I have a W196 and F555 but my favourite here is the T50B, there's a couple at the club but only seen once.

I'm loving the realistic tyre and track widths as these are often spoiled by being ridiculously wide 'because they go better'.

Kev's Scarab is a beauty  

---

RE: Summer Grand Prix Proxy - Kevan - 7th-Jun-22

(7th-Jun-22, 08:33 AM)Graham Wrote:  All cars were fully compliant in the classes A.B.C. There is an issue in regards to the overall width of 3 of the cars in class D but having seen and measured  them there is absolutely no chance that you could have made them meet the 62mm width for the early modern cars. So I accept that this maximum track width was rather naive for this class and accept the specification was too narrow. So I will declare that all the cars are compliant.

Maybe 66mm would be better or specify 12mm wide rears as the 90's era had 380mm wide rears which are narrower tyres than modern ones.

---

RE: Summer Grand Prix Proxy - Graham - 7th-Jun-22

Classic Class (1961-1968)

1964 Honda 804 #6 (Bangers Racing)
[attachment=24024]

1962 Lotus 24 #3 (Team RNLI)
[attachment=24025]

1961 Cooper Climax #10 (RoadRunners)
[attachment=24026]

---

RE: Summer Grand Prix Proxy - Kevan - 7th-Jun-22

Porsche 804, not Honda.

---

RE: Summer Grand Prix Proxy - Graham - 7th-Jun-22

Legends (1969-1989)

1979 Williams FW07 #27 (Team Tatters)
[attachment=24027]

1973 Shadow DN1 #16 (Mountain View)
[attachment=24028]

1971 Matra MS120 #8 ( Rokers Roar)
[attachment=24029]

1978 Tyrell 008 #4  (Scott Sports)
[attachment=24030]

1983 Ferrari 126C2 #27 (Ruscillo Racing)
[attachment=24031]

1986 Williams FW11 #6 (Bangers Racing)
[attachment=24032]

---

RE: Summer Grand Prix Proxy - Kevan - 7th-Jun-22

What a refreshing change to see the old cars being made competitive...and not an NSR in sight 

---

RE: Summer Grand Prix Proxy - Graham - 7th-Jun-22

Modern (1990-Today)

2004 Dallara #11 (Team Tatters)
[attachment=24037]

2017 Williams FW40 #19 (Team Cube)
[attachment=24038]

1998 Mclaren MP4/13 #11 (Courtney Sport)
[attachment=24039]

1997 Jordan 197 #11 (Ruscillo Racing)
[attachment=24040]

2008 Renault R28 #3 (Scott Sports)
[attachment=24041]


A quick coffee break and I will be posting the Round 1 Class A & C Results, still hoping the "postie" will deliver the last two cars, so I can have a complete set of results.

---

RE: Summer Grand Prix Proxy - classicchrisk - 7th-Jun-22

(7th-Jun-22, 09:29 AM)Kevan Wrote:  Porsche 804, not Honda.

And, Bangers Racing, not Team Tatters!

---